Bullet points on why WPT is awesome?
Maybe background on what the SpeedIndex measurement is?
Actually 4,752 URLs are tested’
Note the long tail –
818 is publico.es which had a spike around the test period and is back to normal - http://mobile.httparchive.org/viewsite.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.publico.es%2F&l=Apr%2015%202014
Note the long tail –
818 is publico.es which had a spike around the test period and is back to normal - http://mobile.httparchive.org/viewsite.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.publico.es%2F&l=Apr%2015%202014
Note the long tail –
818 is publico.es which had a spike around the test period and is back to normal - http://mobile.httparchive.org/viewsite.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.publico.es%2F&l=Apr%2015%202014
30 sites have <40 requests and take over 25s to load
30 sites have <40 requests and take over 25s to load
This is your Moto G data
40 of the top 1,000 sites *in HTTP archive* are under 1MB, but take over 25 seconds to load.
40 of the top 1,000 sites *in HTTP archive* are under 1MB, but take over 25 seconds to load.
40 of the top 1,000 sites *in HTTP archive* are under 1MB, but take over 25 seconds to load.
TCP connections need to be made for each of them
CSS and the critical path – Patrick Hamman - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W0FBNbMLs0
I don’t know if this chart is great.. But my idea is that fast sites are closer to zero external CSS. Slower sites are more likely to have 2-4 CSS (and it only gets worse)
May be the bulk of the download but growing more slow and more importantly aren’t render blocking